Case 2400814/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Malius v Eco Providers Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400814/2024
- Decision date
- 17 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Malius
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Leach, sitting alone at Manchester (by CVP) on 10 May 2024, found both of the claimant's complaints well-founded. The respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's final wages in respect of 6 working days worked between 1 and 10 December 2023, and the gross sum deducted was £715.40.
The Tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay the claimant for 2 days of annual leave accrued but not taken at the date her employment ended, with a gross sum owing of £238.46.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £953.86 (being £715.40 plus £238.46), less tax and National Insurance due. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; written reasons were not provided as a matter of course.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from final wages for 6 working days between 1 and 10 December 2023. Gross sum payable less tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £715 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay for 2 days of annual leave accrued but not taken on termination. Gross sum payable less tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £238 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £954
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.