Case 2400819/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Leather v Touch of Glass — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400819/2022
- Decision date
- 21 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Leather
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 12 September 2022, the tribunal gave Miss E Leather an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why her claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that no sufficient written representations were made and no hearing was requested.
Employment Judge Dunlop therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any remedy, and it does not identify the underlying claim type within the judgment text itself. The judgment was sent to the parties on 21 October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The case listing provided outside the judgment refers to unlawful deduction from wages, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.