Case 2400823/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Richardson v Griff Services Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2400823/2020
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Manchester before Employment Judge Liz Ord, dealt with Mr L Richardson's complaint against Griff Services Ltd. The written judgment records that the case was heard on 15 September 2021 and that the claimant appeared in person, while the respondent was represented by Mr T Goldup, a consultant.
The only claim identified in the judgment was unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal held that the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. No separate liability reasoning is set out in the written record, because the judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
No monetary award is recorded in the written judgment. The notes state that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, so the extracted record contains only the dismissal outcome and does not include further findings or remedy information.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.