Case 2400827/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Robinson v Gemini Trading NW Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400827/2024
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cookson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Robinson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the material before the tribunal, the judge found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement of 9 days.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £703.35, calculated as gross hourly pay of £10.42 multiplied by 7.5 hours multiplied by 9 days. The claimant was made responsible for any tax liabilities arising from receipt of the gross figure. The hearing listed for 10 May 2024 was cancelled, and a notice was issued under Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 setting the relevant decision day as 1 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 determination following respondent's failure to present a valid response. Award represents 9 days' accrued untaken annual leave (gross hourly pay £10.42 x 7.5 hours x 9). | Upheld | — | £703 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £703
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Article 12 of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.