Case 2400829/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Imran v Skulpt (cheshire) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400829/2022
- Decision date
- 26 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Imran
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
The tribunal ordered Skulpt (Cheshire) Limited to pay Miss N Imran the gross sum of £1,513.55 in respect of November 2021. The judgment states that the respondent must account for any statutory deductions from that figure, and that the remaining balance is to be paid to the claimant. The separate notice on interest explains the statutory position if the sum remains unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest award is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,513.55 for November 2021, subject to statutory deductions. | Upheld | — | £1,514 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,514
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.