Case 2400830/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Antrobus v Active Financial Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400830/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Antrobus
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent did not present a response. On the information before the tribunal, Regional Employment Judge Parkin recorded that Mr P Antrobus was employed as Operations, Driver and Transport Planning Manager by the respondent's In-Motion Logistics division, reporting to Mr Andrew Swain.
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the total gross sum of £2,200.00.
The judgment also included the standard notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that if the sum was not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest would accrue from 7 May 2020 at the stipulated rate of 8%. No separate interest amount was specified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,200.00. | Upheld | — | £2,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.