Case 2400842/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gladwin v Renewable Solutions Team Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2400842/2022
- Decision date
- 1 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gladwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out Mr S Gladwin's claim against Renewable Solutions Team Ltd. The judgment states that the respondent company was in administration and that neither the consent of the administrator nor the permission of the court had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that on 27 April 2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. On that basis, the tribunal struck the claim out.
No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were made. The judgment is a procedural strike-out decision only, and it does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out because the respondent was in administration and neither the administrator's consent nor the court's permission had been obtained, and because the claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to do so on 27 April 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.