Case 2400859/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Timothy Bettney v Ethiopian Airlines Group Heard: Manchester Employment Tribunal — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400859/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Tobin Members
- Panel members
- Mr B Rowen, Dr B Tirohl
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Timothy Bettney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting as a panel in Manchester before Employment Judge G Tobin with Mr B Rowen and Dr B Tirohl, unanimously found that the claimant, who had worked for the respondent for almost 19 years as a Traffic Sales Manager at Manchester airport, succeeded on 4 of 5 allegations of direct race discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 and on his claim of indirect race discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010. The Tribunal also found he was constructively unfairly dismissed pursuant to s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996.
On the discrimination claims, the Tribunal accepted matters including exclusion from meetings in Addis Ababa, the holding of meetings in Amharic which the claimant did not speak, denial of a company car given to other managers, and a differential leave and sick-leave regime. The Tribunal identified a provision, criterion or practice contained in the respondent's policy manual (section 7.3.4.4) restricting Area Manager, TSM and Station Manager appointments outside Africa to those from Africa absent approved exception, which the Tribunal found discriminatory in relation to race.
On constructive dismissal, the Tribunal held that the cumulative conduct, including the uncertainty following expiry of the claimant's fixed-term appointment, the unlawful discrimination found, long hours, the removal of his role and its allocation to a colleague from Oman, and what the Tribunal described as a 'crass' rejection of his grievance, amounted to fundamental breaches of contract. The grievance outcome was treated as the 'last straw'. The Tribunal found the claimant had not affirmed the contract by resigning approximately one month after the grievance outcome. Remedy was reserved to a later stage.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010. Claimant succeeded on 4 of 5 allegations of direct race discrimination. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination under s19 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal pursuant to s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996. Remedy to be addressed later; not quantified in the liability judgment provided. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s19 Equality Act 2010
- s23(1) Equality Act 2010
- s136 Equality Act 2010
- s95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Woods v WM Car Services
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.