Case 2400864/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Surdeep Singh v 3RIO Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400864/2024
- Decision date
- 5 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Surdeep Singh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal granted the claimant's reconsideration application dated 8 August 2024 after accepting that he had been continuously employed for more than two years by the respondent. It varied the earlier judgment by revoking paragraph 22 and substituting a finding that the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered the respondent to pay a basic award of £4,375.00. No compensatory award was made, and the recoupment regulations did not apply. It also stated that no award was made for failure to provide a written statement of the main terms of employment because that issue had not been raised in the claim form.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Reconsideration was granted after the tribunal found the claimant had been continuously employed for more than two years. The unfair dismissal claim was then held well-founded. | Upheld | — | £4,375 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,375
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,375
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.