Case 2400877/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Elsmore v Opal Accounting Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2400877/2022
- Decision date
- 4 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 20 and 21 December 2023, Employment Judge Horne heard a costs application in Miss V Elsmore v Opal Accounting Limited. The written judgment records that it was a costs order made under rules 75 and 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,101.14, which the judgment states included VAT of £140.00. The order was stated to have effect notwithstanding the stay of the claim. No substantive liability outcome on the underlying employment claim is recorded in this written decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs order under rules 75 and 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013; this written decision does not record a substantive liability finding on the stayed claim. | Upheld | — | £1,101 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,101
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 75 and 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.