Case 2400892/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M H A War v Legacie Contracts Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2400892/2025
- Decision date
- 1 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Cowen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M H A War
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims concerning unpaid statutory sick pay, unpaid wages, and holiday pay against Legacie Contracts Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the statutory sick pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also recorded that the claim for unpaid wages and holiday pay was ill-founded and dismissed. Written reasons were not included because reasons were given orally at the hearing and would only be provided if requested within the stated period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unlawful deduction from wages in respect of unpaid statutory sick pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim of unlawful deduction from wages in respect of unpaid wages was found to be ill-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The holiday pay claim was included in the tribunal's statement that the unpaid wages and holiday pay claim was ill-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.