Case 2400939/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Silova v LIG Facilities Solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400939/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Silova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 19 May 2022 before Employment Judge Sharkett. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay wages owed to the claimant, and that this amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal therefore upheld that claim and ordered payment of £3,519, with the claimant responsible for any employee tax or national insurance due on that amount.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant’s claim for payment in lieu of holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination. It ordered payment of £504 for that entitlement, again subject to the claimant’s responsibility for any employee tax and national insurance due. In addition, the tribunal found that the claimant had not been provided with a written statement of employment particulars, in breach of sections 1 to 6 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Because no reason was identified why it would not be just and equitable to do so, the tribunal made an award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 of two weeks’ pay for the written statement breach. That award was £1,120, subject to the claimant’s responsibility for any employee tax and national insurance due. The total award recorded by the judgment was £5,143.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay wages owed and treated this as an unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,519 |
| Holiday pay | Award for payment in lieu of holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars in breach of s1-6 Employment Rights Act 1996; tribunal made an award of two weeks' pay under s38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,120 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,143
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s1-6 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.