Case 2400954/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Jackson v Funky Owl (DAK) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2400954/2020
- Decision date
- 3 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued under Rule 21. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £101.80 net.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £123.15 net, recorded as £123.15 per week. The notice accompanying the judgment set out the statutory interest position if the judgment sum was not paid within 14 days, but did not award a separate interest sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £101.80 net. | Upheld | — | £102 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £123.15 net. Although the judgment also uses the phrase 'unlawful dismissal', the finding is framed as breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £123 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £225
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.