Case 2400992/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Gasiorek v PM Group of Hotels Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400992/2020
- Decision date
- 29 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett
- Panel members
- Dr B Tirohl, Mrs A Armstrong
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Gasiorek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis case was listed for a three-day hearing at Manchester via cloud video platform on 21 November 2022. On the first morning the claimant, Miss P Gasiorek, did not attend and had not notified the tribunal that she would not be attending. The witnesses who had prepared statements on her behalf were also absent. Attempts were made to contact the claimant by telephone and email without success, and the respondent’s representative said the respondent had not had contact with her for about five months.
The tribunal adjourned until midday to give the claimant an opportunity to respond to the messages left for her, but she still had not contacted the tribunal when the case was recalled. The respondent invited dismissal under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, or alternatively strike out under Rule 37(1)(e) on the basis that the claimant had failed actively to pursue the claim. Having considered the nature of the claims and the degree of factual dispute, the tribunal decided that the claim should be dismissed under Rule 47. The judgment and reasons were sent to the parties on 29 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses claim number 2400992/2020 as a whole under Rule 47. It does not identify the individual substantive heads of claim in the reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47
- Rule 37(1)(e)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.