Case 2400993/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Bruton v Sodexo Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2400993/2021
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten BJ
- Panel members
- BJ McCaughey, D Wilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Bruton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard claims by Mr C Bruton against Sodexo Limited at Manchester on 30 June, 1 July and 5-9 December 2022. The claimant represented himself and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The Tribunal decided that the unfair dismissal claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also decided that the disability discrimination claim failed and dismissed it.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the stated time limit. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment records that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment records that the disability discrimination claim failed and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, but no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.