Case 2401004/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Manley v Lucas Johnson Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401004/2021
- Decision date
- 12 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Manley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented on 11 January 2021. The judgment records that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time or at all, and that a determination could properly be made under Rule 21 following a preliminary hearing on 9 May 2022. Judge Brian Doyle then determined the claim on the papers.
The tribunal recorded that Mrs E Manley was constructively dismissed by Lucas Johnson Ltd in circumstances amounting to unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. It found the claim well-founded and stated that it succeeds. No further reasons, factual findings, or liability analysis are set out in the extracted judgment beyond that summary determination.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay compensation in the total sum of £13,279.22, calculated in accordance with the claimant's Schedule of Loss. The judgment also states that the recoupment regulations do not apply. No separate breakdown of the award by claim or head of loss is given in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively dismissed in circumstances amounting to unfair dismissal. The respondent did not present a valid response and the tribunal made a Rule 21 determination; no separate compensation split for this claim is given. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant was constructively dismissed in circumstances amounting to disability discrimination. The respondent did not present a valid response and the tribunal made a Rule 21 determination; no separate compensation split for this claim is given. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,279
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.