Case 2401011/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr John Spensley v Hyde Time Ltd trading as West Riding — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401011/2021
- Decision date
- 18 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr John Spensley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr John Spensley brought claims against Hyde Time Ltd trading as West Riding for unauthorised deductions from wages under section 13(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal recorded that the claim for withheld commission, pleaded at £3,583.20, was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claim for 2 days holiday pay under section 13(1) ERA 1996, again finding that it was not well founded. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and no separate written reasons were provided in the record. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deductions from wages under s.13(1) ERA 1996 in respect of withheld commission, pleaded at £3,583.20, was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for 2 days holiday pay under s.13(1) ERA 1996 was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.