Case 2401021/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hand v Alan Thompson Motor Engineers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401021/2021
- Decision date
- 28 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hand
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Mr G Hand's claim for a redundancy payment. It held that the claim was not well-founded and did not award any redundancy sum.
The claimant succeeded on his claim for statutory notice pay. The tribunal found that he was entitled to 12 weeks' notice altogether, that the respondent had already paid 4 weeks' notice, and that the balance due was 8 weeks' notice pay.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,736.00 in respect of that 8-week notice period. The Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant's statutory notice pay claim was well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum of £2,736.00 for 8 weeks' notice pay, having already paid 4 weeks' notice out of the 12 weeks due overall. | Upheld | — | £2,736 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,736
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.