Case 2401072/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Starkie v Shifrank Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401072/2024
- Decision date
- 2 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Starkie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. It found the claimant’s breach of contract complaint in relation to notice pay well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £2,700 in damages. The judgment says the figure was calculated using gross pay because the claimant might have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay.
The unfair dismissal complaint was also found well-founded. The tribunal recorded that the respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015 and that it was just and equitable to increase the compensatory award by 25% under s.207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. On that basis, it awarded a basic award of £6,750, a compensatory award of £7,312.50, made up of £5,850 for loss of earnings and a £1,462.50 ACAS uplift, and £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The holiday pay complaint was found well-founded as an unauthorised deduction from wages because the respondent failed to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. The tribunal ordered payment of £360 and noted that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that sum. The judgment states that the total amount payable under the judgment was £17,622.50.
The written record also included the standard Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 notice, stating that the stipulated rate of interest was 8% per annum if any sum remained unpaid after the relevant decision day. The claimant’s disability discrimination claim was not determined by this judgment and remained listed for a preliminary hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay breach of contract claim found well-founded; damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect the possibility of tax as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £2,700 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim found well-founded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £6,750, a compensatory award of £7,312.50 comprising £5,850 for loss of earnings and a 25% ACAS uplift of £1,462.50, plus £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £14,563 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay claim found well-founded as an unauthorised deduction from wages for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. The tribunal recorded that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £360 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,623
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,750
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,313
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.