Case 2401123/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dawber v IM Group Services HELD AT: Liverpool (by CVP) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401123/2024
- Decision date
- 25 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dawber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ganner sat alone at Liverpool by CVP on 6 June 2024. The claimant, Mr D Dawber, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the tribunal gave its reasons orally at the hearing, so the written record contains only the formal outcome.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint. It found that IM Group Services had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the net sum of £148.00.
The written judgment states that the total sum payable by the respondent to the claimant was £148.00. No separate breakdown of remedy was provided in the judgment, and the interest notice attached to the decision is administrative only.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £148.00. | Upheld | — | £148 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £148
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.