Case 2401141/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Fawcett v Logikal Network Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401141/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Fawcett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Fawcett brought a complaint of unfair dismissal against Logikal Network Limited. Employment Judge Liz Ord, sitting alone in Liverpool, found that the complaint was well-founded and that it succeeded.
The tribunal recorded that compensation would be reduced by 50% to take account of two matters: the possibility that the claimant would have been dismissed in any event, and contributory conduct. The written judgment record does not state any final monetary award or split the compensation into component parts.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint well-founded and ordered a 50% reduction in compensation to reflect the possibility that he would have been dismissed in any event and contributory conduct. The written record does not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.