Case 2401143/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs I Ferrero Parada v Complete Accounting Results Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401143/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs I Ferrero Parada
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs I Ferrero Parada's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,625. The judgment also stated that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, with damages of £1,625 awarded on that claim.
The tribunal further ordered damages of £93 for breach of contract in respect of exam fee reimbursement. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £135. The hearing listed for 21 April 2020 was cancelled, and the judgment directed that the sums due be paid within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,625. | Upheld | — | £1,625 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of notice; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages of £1,625. | Upheld | — | £1,625 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of exam fee reimbursement; the tribunal ordered damages of £93. | Upheld | — | £93 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £135. | Upheld | — | £135 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,478
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.