Case 2401160/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Clough v Portzone Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401160/2020
- Decision date
- 16 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Clough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal entered judgment under Rule 21. It found that Portzone Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Ms B Clough's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,256.10 gross in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement due at the termination of employment and ordered payment of £656.80 gross. No separate reasons, legal analysis, or split of the award beyond those two sums are set out in the extracted judgment text.
The attached notice explains that sums payable under the judgment may attract interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, with the stipulated rate stated as 8%, but no quantified interest figure is included in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,256.10. | Upheld | — | £2,256 |
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under Rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay holiday entitlement due at the termination of employment and ordered payment of the gross sum of £656.80. | Upheld | — | £657 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,913
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.