Case 2401160/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C Ogden Z Wilson v Tibard Laundry Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401160/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KM Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C Ogden Z Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge KM Ross determined these linked claims under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment recorded that C Ogden was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,486.13.
The same judgment recorded that Z Wilson was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,625.52. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay Z Wilson's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £406.38, stated to represent 5 days' pay at £81.27 per day.
The written notice attached to the judgment stated that interest would be payable if the sums were not paid in full within 14 days of the relevant decision day, which was 27 November 2024, with interest accruing from 28 November 2024 at 8% per annum. The judgment also stated that neither claimant should attend the hearing listed on 20 December 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that C Ogden was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,486.13 under a Rule 21 determination. | Upheld | — | £5,486 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that Z Wilson was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,625.52 under a Rule 21 determination. | Upheld | — | £1,626 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay Z Wilson's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £406.38, stated to be 5 days' pay at £81.27 per day. | Upheld | — | £406 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,518
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.