Case 2401167/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Featherstone v Trusted Group Holdings Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401167/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Featherstone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 27 May 2020 and sent to the parties on 2 June 2020, made because the respondent did not present a response. On the information before Regional Employment Judge Parkin, the tribunal found that Mr Featherstone had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for one week's notice pay in the gross sum of £326.94.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £204.83 net, described as representing 3½ days net pay. The attached notice on tribunal interest explained when statutory interest may accrue if sums remain unpaid, but the judgment itself did not award a separate interest figure. The total monetary award recorded by the tribunal is £531.77.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; one week's notice pay awarded in the gross sum of £326.94. The judgment noted that HMRC may require tax and national insurance to be paid on this sum as Post-Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £327 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; holiday entitlement awarded in the net sum of £204.83, described as representing 3½ days net pay. | Upheld | — | £205 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £532
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.