Case 2401172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr David Wilson - Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401172/2020
- Decision date
- 3 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss N Jones, succeeded in a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against WDR Homecare Limited trading as Right at Home Cheshire East. The hearing was at Manchester on 28 August 2020 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by its director, Mr David Wilson.
The tribunal amended the respondent's name and found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the sum of £650. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay that sum forthwith. The tribunal also recorded that the amount was gross, so the claimant was responsible for accounting to the appropriate authorities for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due on receipt.
The reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were issued. The accompanying notice on interest stated the relevant decision day as 3 September 2020, the calculation day as 4 September 2020, and the stipulated interest rate as 8%, but the judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal amended the respondent's name to WDR Homecare Limited trading as Right at Home Cheshire East and found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the sum of £650. | Upheld | — | £650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £650
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.