Case 2401173/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Cooper v Swans Travel Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401173/2023
- Decision date
- 29 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCarthy REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Cooper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by CVP at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 9 February 2024 before Employment Judge McCarthy. The claimant, Mr D Cooper, brought complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages for holiday pay and wages, breach of contract, and wrongful dismissal/notice pay against Swans Travel Limited.
The tribunal held that each complaint had been presented outside the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to present the complaints in time. On that basis, the tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claims.
All complaints in the claim were dismissed and the claim was dismissed in full. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint described as unauthorised deductions from wages, including holiday pay and wages; dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed on the same time-limit basis. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Included in the tribunal's reference to wrongful dismissal/notice pay; dismissed as out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.