Case 2401205/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Waring v Atlantic Bar & Grill Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401205/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Waring
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mr M Waring’s claim for unpaid wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded, and that his claim for unpaid accrued holiday under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 also succeeded. The written judgment gives no further factual analysis or dispute summary beyond those conclusions.
The respondent was ordered to pay £840.00 in total. That sum comprised £360.00 for underpayment by reference to the national minimum wage and £480.00 for unpaid accrued holiday. No separate element of damages, injury to feelings, costs, or other award is set out in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996; the award for underpayment by reference to the national minimum wage was £360.00. | Upheld | — | £360 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued holiday under regulation 13 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; the award was £480.00. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £840
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Part II Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.