Case 2401216/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Grzelak v Dominscy Associates Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401216/2021
- Decision date
- 24 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Grzelak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs E Grzelak brought claims against Dominscy Associates Limited for unpaid accrued holiday and unlawful deduction from wages. The respondent did not attend the hearing. The tribunal held that both claims succeeded: the holiday pay claim under Part XI of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulations 13 to 16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and the wages claim under Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay a total of £989.41. That total was made up of £350.00 for holiday pay and £639.41 for unpaid wages. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest, costs, compensation, or injury to feelings.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid accrued holiday under Part XI Employment Rights Act 1996 and regulations 13-16 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £989
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.