Case 2401219/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Iqbal v Bupa Insurance Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401219/2021
- Decision date
- 7 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Iqbal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 1 October 2021 before Employment Judge Aspinall. The tribunal dealt with the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions from wages at this stage of the proceedings.
The tribunal dismissed both the unfair dismissal and unlawful deductions claims because they had been brought out of time. It found that the claimant could not show that it had not been reasonably practicable for him to present those claims within the applicable time limit.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of disability discrimination continued and was not determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claim was brought out of time and the claimant could not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the claim was brought out of time and the claimant could not show that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.