Case 2401220/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Scurrah v Ashton Construction (UK) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401220/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Scurrah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment, Employment Judge Batten found that Ashton Construction (UK) Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Ms J Scurrah's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,560.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £720.00 for that claim. The judgment was sent to the parties on 8 July 2020.
A separate notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 accompanied the judgment, stating that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. The notice recorded 8 July 2020 as the relevant decision day and 9 July 2020 as the calculation day, with a stipulated rate of interest of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21; the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,560.00. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
| Holiday pay | Determined under Rule 21; the tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £720.00 for holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,280
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.