Case 2401223/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Openshaw v PCK Skin Manchester Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401223/2020
- Decision date
- 2 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Openshaw
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent did not resist the claim. On the information before the tribunal, Regional Employment Judge Parkin found that PCK Skin Manchester Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss A Openshaw's wages.
The judgment records that the deductions totalled £2,413.41 gross after credit was given for a payment of £1,000.00 made on 13 February 2020. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Miss Openshaw the gross sum of £2,413.13. The text of the judgment contains a small internal inconsistency between the stated deductions figure and the ordered sum, so the ordered amount is used as the award figure.
The hearing listed for 7 April 2020 was cancelled. The accompanying notice explains that statutory interest may apply if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no separate interest sum is stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The text states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions totalling £2,413.41 gross after crediting a payment of £1,000.00 made on 13 February 2020, but the order itself requires payment of £2,413.13 gross. The ordered sum is used as the remedy amount. | Upheld | — | £2,413 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,413
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.