Case 2401229/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wilson v JH Automotive Refinishing Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401229/2021
- Decision date
- 9 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 7 July 2021 and sent to the parties on 9 July 2021. Employment Judge Phil Allen determined the matter without a full hearing. The claimant, Mr P Wilson, succeeded on all three claims recorded in the judgment against JH Automotive Refinishing Ltd (in voluntary liquidation).
The tribunal held that Mr Wilson had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £720. It also found that he had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,080.
Separately, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,656. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning beyond those findings and awards. A notice attached to the judgment explains that tribunal awards may attract statutory interest if unpaid after 14 days, with the relevant decision day identified as 9 July 2021 and the calculation day as 10 July 2021, but no interest figure is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £720 damages. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment: the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded £1,080 as a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,656. | Upheld | — | £1,656 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,456
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.