Case 2401242/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wole Johnson v Sandcastle Care Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401242/2020
- Decision date
- 18 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Serr Representation
- Venue
- Manchester via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wole Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 15 January 2021 before Employment Judge Serr, the respondent applied to strike out the claimant's claim under Schedule 1 Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal refused the application. The written judgment records that the tribunal's reasons were given in the case management order of the same date.
The judgment did not determine the merits of the claimant's substantive complaints. Instead, it varied the case management timetable of 3 July 2020 and confirmed that the hearing remained listed for 4 and 5 February 2021. The written record also states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal rules.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent applied to strike out the claimant's claim under Schedule 1 Rule 37(1)(c) of the ET (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal refused that application. The underlying substantive claims were not determined in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.