Case 2401251/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jones v Ava-V Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401251/2024
- Decision date
- 11 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 17 June 2024, the tribunal gave Ava-V Ltd an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with Employment Judge Allen's order dated 3 June 2024. The respondent did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the response. It recorded that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
The hearing listed for 22 July 2024 was cancelled, and the reasons state that a rule 21 judgment would be issued in the claimant's favour. The text does not record any substantive findings on the underlying wages claim or any monetary award in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's response was struck out for failure to comply with Employment Judge Allen's order dated 3 June 2024. The reasons state that a rule 21 judgment would be issued in the claimant's favour, but this text does not record any substantive liability findings or quantified remedy. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.