Case 2401257/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Ullah v Star Alliance FM Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 2401257/2017
- Decision date
- 25 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Ullah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the time for presenting a response had expired and the respondent had not presented a valid response. The claimant, Mr Z Ullah, brought a complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages against Star Alliance FM Limited.
The tribunal held that the complaint was well-founded and succeeded. It found that the respondent had unlawfully deducted £1,885.00 gross from wages due to the claimant. The figure was made up of 208 hours worked in September 2016 and 110 hours worked in October 2016, calculated at £7.50 per hour, giving £2,385.00 in total, less £500 already paid.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,885.00, subject to the appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, together with the £160 tribunal fee paid by the claimant. The hearing listed for 10 May 2017 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,885 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions, plus the £160 tribunal fee. | Upheld | — | £1,885 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.