Case 2401265/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Fioreze v Tru Street Food Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401265/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Fioreze
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment by Employment Judge Slater. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,002.76 net.
The tribunal also found an unlawful deduction from wages in relation to the respondent’s failure to make a payment in lieu of the claimant’s accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £766.48 gross. The judgment notice added that statutory interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would apply if sums remained unpaid after 14 days, with 30 April 2020 recorded as the relevant decision day, 1 May 2020 as the calculation day, and 8% as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,002.76. | Upheld | — | £1,003 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages arising from the failure to make a payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £766.48. | Upheld | — | £766 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,769
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.