Case 2401273/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Harrop v Hughes Safety Showers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401273/2021
- Decision date
- 18 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Harrop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Peck, sitting alone at Manchester by CVP, dismissed Mr P Harrop’s unauthorised deduction from wages claim against Hughes Safety Showers Limited. The tribunal held that the deductions made from the claimant’s wages for the period from 11 December 2020 onwards were made on account of an overpayment of wages and were therefore authorised deductions within section 14 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal also found that from 5 October 2020 the claimant received the amount of pay per hour properly payable to him, so there was no deduction of wages within section 13(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record records only the dismissal of the claim and the legal basis for that conclusion.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 14 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 13(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.