Case 2401286/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Oyewole v New Hope Care Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401286/2025
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Oyewole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of the claim, or part of it, under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant GBP 2,800 gross. The claim for a redundancy payment was struck out because the claimant had been employed by the respondent for less than two years.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and must pay GBP 2,800 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,800 |
| Redundancy | The claim for a redundancy payment was struck out because the claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,800
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.