Case 2401288/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Connor v Openshaw AEU Club & Institute Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401288/2021
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Buzzard sat alone in a video hearing on 20 April 2021. The respondent did not appear and filed no defence. The judgment was sent to the parties on 26 April 2021, and the note records that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons would be provided unless requested.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's redundancy payment claim and ordered the respondent to pay £4,976.57. It also upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay, expressed as a claim under s13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and awarded £603.22, calculated as two weeks' pay.
The tribunal further upheld the claimant's breach of contract claim for failure to give notice of dismissal and awarded £3,317.71, calculated as 11 weeks' pay. The three awards total £8,897.50. The interest notice states that tribunal money awards, excluding discrimination and equal pay awards and certain expenses, may carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if unpaid after the relevant period.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the redundancy payment claim well founded and ordered £4,976.57. | Upheld | — | £4,977 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim under s13 ERA 1996 well founded and ordered £603.22, calculated as two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £603 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the notice claim well founded and ordered £3,317.71, calculated as 11 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £3,318 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,898
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.