Case 2401298/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 2401298/2025
- Decision date
- 11 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 11 February 2026 was listed by CVP for case management purposes. The claim related to allegations of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments, and the claimant's employment was continuing.
The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The Tribunal noted that the Notice of Hearing and agenda proforma had been sent by post, no completed agenda had been received, the respondent's solicitors had been unable to contact the claimant for a considerable period, and the Tribunal inbox showed no correspondence from her.
After waiting until 2.30 pm and considering the available information about the claimant's absence, the Tribunal dismissed the proceedings in full under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim related to allegations of discrimination arising from disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments. The proceedings were dismissed in full under Rule 47 due to the claimant's non-attendance. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.