Case 2401316/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Wooler v Ropewalks Leisure Group Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401316/2024
- Decision date
- 28 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Wooler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 15 May 2024 before Employment Judge Phil Allen. The claimant, Mr S Wooler, appeared in person and the respondent, Ropewalks Leisure Group Ltd, was represented by its HR Manager, Mr C Hird. The judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim. The judgment does not set out the reasons for that strike-out in the written record provided here, and no remedy was awarded on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the breach of contract claim was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states this claim was 'not well-founded' and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.