Case 2401321/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Sandiford v Take A Sip Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401321/2024
- Decision date
- 9 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Sandiford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 after finding that the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, Employment Judge M Butler made a determination on the papers without a contested hearing.
The tribunal found that Take A Sip Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in relation to non-payment of wages for work done in December 2023. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,333 gross for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £538 gross, described as statutory notice pay of 1 week and calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as post-employment notice pay. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,076 gross for 10 days, described as 2 weeks at £538 per week.
The tribunal stated that the respondent must pay £3,947 in total. It also noted that the claimant would be responsible for any tax liabilities arising if the gross award was paid without deduction at source, and it cancelled the hearing listed for 5 September 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as gross wages for work done in December 2023. | Upheld | — | £2,333 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as statutory notice pay of 1 week, calculated on gross pay to reflect post-employment notice pay treatment. | Upheld | — | £538 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 10 days' accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, stated as 2 weeks at £538 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,076 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,947
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.