Case 2401358/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Mcpake v Reactive Solutions FM Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401358/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Mcpake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a Rule 21 judgment dated 5 June 2024 and sent to the parties on 18 June 2024, Employment Judge Holmes Date found that Mr R Mcpake had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal awarded him gross damages of £1,730.70 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that Mr Mcpake was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,730.70. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay his annual leave entitlement on termination of employment and awarded £576.92 gross for that sum.
The respondent was ordered to pay the total gross sum of £4,038.32, being the combined amounts in paragraphs 1 to 3 of the judgment. The judgment also stated that Mr Mcpake would be responsible for any tax liabilities arising if the gross award was received without deduction at source.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages for notice on dismissal. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to annual leave entitlement on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £577 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,038
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.