Case 2401366/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Makhdoom v Jessica Broe and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401366/2024
- Decision date
- 8 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Makhdoom
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Manchester hearing on 5 August 2024, Employment Judge M Butler delayed the start of the hearing, made enquiries about the claimant’s non-attendance, and considered the information available on the tribunal file. The judgment records that, having done so, the claim under case number 2401366/2024 was dismissed in its entirety because the claimant did not attend.
The written record does not set out the underlying causes of action, any findings on the merits, or any remedy assessment. It also states that the dismissal of this case does not affect case number 2407006/2023, which was listed to proceed to final hearing on 11 to 14 November 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the case in its entirety under rule 47 of the ET (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The judgment does not identify the underlying pleaded cause or causes of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the ET (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.