Case 2401375/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Craig Milburn v Illingworth Ingham Mcr Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401375/2021
- Decision date
- 14 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Craig Milburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Craig Milburn’s unfair dismissal claim against Illingworth Ingham Mcr Ltd was well-founded and therefore succeeded. The decision was given orally at the hearing on 18 January 2022, with the written record sent to the parties on 14 February 2022.
On remedy, the tribunal recorded that, absent the errors in the process, it was 90% likely that the claimant would have been dismissed in any event. It therefore stated that any compensatory award would be reduced by 90%.
The extracted judgment does not state any monetary award figure, nor does it record a basic award, compensatory award total, interest, or a final total award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well-founded. It also stated that, absent the errors in the process, it was 90% likely the claimant would have been dismissed, so any compensatory award would be reduced by 90%; no monetary figure is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.