Case 2401401/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Kosnik v Total Recruitment Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401401/2022
- Decision date
- 19 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Kosnik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was listed as the final hearing of Miss E Kosnik's claim against Total Recruitment Solutions Ltd, which the tribunal understood to concern non-payment of holiday pay, and possibly sick pay. The hearing had previously been postponed on 17 June 2022 because of the respondent's non-attendance and confusion about the hearing notice, and it was re-listed for 15 August 2022.
Before the hearing, on 12 July 2022, the tribunal made case management orders requiring the claimant to set out the amounts claimed and requiring both parties to exchange documentary and witness evidence. No evidence was received from either side before the hearing or by the time it was due to start. Neither party attended or was represented when the case was called, and the tribunal waited until 10.30am.
In those circumstances, and in the absence of any communication from either party since April 2022 or since the postponed hearing in June 2022, Judge Brian Doyle decided there was no purpose in trying to contact them. The tribunal noted that the failure to comply with the case management orders pointed towards the possibility that the claim had been settled in some way, but it could not decide the claim on its merits without evidence beyond the ET1 and ET3.
Accordingly, acting under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the claim was dismissed. The tribunal added that if the absence of one or both parties had been inadvertent or otherwise explicable, it would readily revoke the judgment under rules 70 to 73 and relist the final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant complained of non-payment of holiday pay, and possibly sick pay. The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 because neither party attended and there was no evidence to determine the claim on its merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 47 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rules 70-73 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.