Case 2401403/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Stone v Clarkson House Residential Care Home Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401403/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rhodes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Stone
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs K Stone brought complaints of unfair dismissal and breach of contract in relation to notice against Clarkson House Residential Care Home Limited. The case was heard at Manchester via CVP on 14 and 15 June 2022 before Employment Judge Rhodes sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that the breach of contract complaint in relation to notice was not well-founded and dismissed it. No monetary award was made on either complaint.
The respondent's application for costs under Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure was also dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note attached to the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint was in relation to notice. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.