Case 2401403/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Phillips v TPR Care Services Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401403/2024
- Decision date
- 3 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Phillips
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 November 2024, the tribunal gave Miss A Phillips an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claim had not been actively pursued, that she failed to attend the case management preliminary hearing on 30 August 2024 without any warning or excuse, and that she did not contact the tribunal to explain her absence.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing in response to that letter. On that basis, Employment Judge Holmes ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the underlying claim type. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, the claimant did not attend the case management preliminary hearing on 30 August 2024 without warning or excuse, and she did not respond to the tribunal's order requiring an explanation for her non-attendance. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.