Sinead Canning (first claimant) Patrick Rowan (second claimant) v UK Accommodation Ops Limited — 2022

The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records no disputed hearing; the claims were determined on the basis of the claimants' holiday entitlement claims and the absence of a valid response from the respondent.

The tribunal found that UK Accommodation Ops Limited had failed to pay Sinead Canning's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay her £674.00, described as 67.4 hours at £10 per hour.

The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay Patrick Rowan's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay him £545.00, described as 54.5 hours at £10 per hour.

The judgment directed payment to both claimants within 14 days of the date of the judgment. A separate notice explained the operation of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and stated that interest would accrue if the sums were not paid within 14 days after the written judgment was sent, but the judgment itself did not specify any separate interest amount.